 |
| That racist Eric Holder needs to go too. |
Random Thoughts on a Confluence of Putrescenses
(Random Thoughts on a Joining of Rotten Things) by Fred Reed, August 15, 2014
Methinks there cometh three horsemen of a sorry apocalypse: First, blacks are again rioting, looting, and burning.
Second, the media are as usual - lying, interpreting, concealing.
Third, swatted-out heavies of a bush-league police force knock reporters around, arresting them for nothing, and refusing to reveal their identities.
Reflect: Every white cop short of the orbit of Neptune knows that if he shoots a black, he faces dismemberment in the media, loss of job and pension, probable criminal charges locally by a publicity-seeking prosecutor, a well-funded civil suit that he can’t afford filed by surviving family members, and trumped-up federal civil-rights charges from an attorney general who doesn’t like whites.
But the white cop doesn’t mind any of this because he wants to shoot a black kid for jaywalking? [Editor’s note: “Of course he doesn’t mind”, says the liberal race peddlers.]
The media, Democrats, and race industry stoke the fires by telling blacks that they are victims, and some seem actually to be looking for a fight. Jesse Jackson is quoted as threatening, “There is a
Wherever blacks and whites come into contact, there is trouble.
With the encouragement of the various Jesses, blacks could make a bad miscalculation. Angry, poorly educated, and living in concentrations that make them seem more numerous than they are, they may miss some important points. They are only thirteen percent of
Food does not come from Safeway, but from remote farms owned by whites in truck driven by whites. If Jesse and Al and the Black Panthers got their race war, blacks would lose it – quickly and badly.
[Editor's note: The Race Baiters are well aware they would lose Fred - which is why they stay put rioting in their own neighborhoods destroying themselves. This is done for nothing other than to build more 'white guilt' - which will be trumpeted by the liberal media. The only suffering will be done by one white cop - and hundreds of hard working 'Americans who happen to be black' that will lose their homes, stores and jobs.]
I doubt that our televised commentators have any idea what they are dealing with. Nor do academics. Whites with university educations, who read five books at once - have never been in a police car, cannot know who the rioters are, cannot imagine how the world seems to them. Black physicists do not loot shoe stores.
Those who do loot tend to be functionally illiterate. The rest have probably never read a book in their lives. They live in a mental world unknown to most whites. They will never live amicably with white cops.
[Editor’s note: Most of the actual
The feds have turned police into low-brow SS, but racial conflict would exist even if this weren’t true. As long as white policemen work in black neighborhoods,
[Editor’s note: I disagree. Blacks riot against blacks who try to get ahead in life. It is called “acting white” and that is a crime in the ‘hood’. It’s mostly black businesses that are destroyed and jobs for blacks that are lost.]
White cops tend to be from the lower middle class, often former military, with the accompanying values. Theirs is a conventional morality of obedience to the law, birth within wedlock, mowing the lawn, neat clothes, making sure the kids do their homework, orderliness, and avoidance of obscenity in mixed company. They are quietly but intensely contemptuous of the blacks of the deep city, whom they see as slovenly, criminal, shiftless, parasitic, and violent.
Don’t write me email about stereotypes etc. I’m telling you what a great many white policemen (I believe I could safely say nearly all) think. What they think and what they see governs their behavior, like it or not.
Meanwhile the blacks see white policemen as hostile occupiers. White cops seem agents of an alien and hostile race, always pushing them around. Speaking as one who has spent many, many nights patrolling with cops in black regions, I know well why the blacks feel this way:
“Hey, you! Yeah, you, with the beer in your hand. Pour it out. You can’t drink in public. I said pour…it…out.”
The obvious, inexpensive, simple, practical solution would be to have only black police in black neighborhoods, and white in white. I suggested this when I was police writer for the Washington Times, but was told that it ran against the policy of compulsory integration. And Black cops didn’t like the idea because it would leave them in the most dangerous jurisdictions.
We need to realize, but will not, that blacks are a separate people, self-aware and cohesive. They have their own dialect, music, and modes of dress, which they value. They name their kids LaToya and Keeshawn instead of Robert and Carol because they want to maintain a distance from whites.
The races spring from utterly different cultures. Compulsory integration is thus a form of social imperialism in which whites try to force blacks to conform to European norms.
Blacks have no historical connection at all to
We talk multiculturism, but try to impose a monoculture—ours—on blacks. Why? Why in school should we insist that blacks study things of no interest to them? It is reminiscent of policies aimed at stripping American Indians of their languages and traditions.
On the other hand, I as a white man have little enthusiasm for studying Shaka Zulu, the Great Zimbabwe, or African religions. Would not all be happier with their own schools in which they could maintain their own culture?
“Separate but equal” is in bad odor as a governing philosophy. It seems to be the only thing that works. If voluntary, wherein lies the evil? Less contact means less conflict.
[The problem again is liberalism and their belief that a utopia is possible – if enough force is used. Liberals really do believe that forcing people to do what they consider as the ‘right thing’ will work. Sort of like ‘the beatings will continue until moral improves.’]
Is there any evidence that blacks want to associate with whites? Or vice versa? In the universities, do blacks not clamor for black-only dormitories, black-only fraternities, and Black Studies? And what is wrong with this? Why should blacks not associate with whom they choose? And why should not whites?
[Editor’s note: Question: How many ‘black only’ colleges and how many ‘white only’ colleges are there?]
Almost always, when the races do not have to mingle, they don’t. In
Note that the togetherness pushed endlessly on us is almost entirely rhetorical, preached by people who mean that others should practice it. [Editors’ note: Typical, hypocritical and the definition of liberalism.) I lived for years in the city with many liberal, racially correct friends. They spent all their time with other whites, and the restaurants and bars they patronized seldom had more than a token black, if that.
Ethnic mixing doesn’t work, gang. Not Moslems and Parisians [Editor's note: Not Muslims and ANYBODY],
Irish Catholics and Protestants, Shias and Sunnis, Indonesians and Chinese, nor
even New Yorkers and Alabamans.
We [Editor’s note: Not We – Liberals] think it should work,
insist that it will, punish those who observe that it doesn’t. Yet still it
doesn’t work. The greater the difference between groups, the less well it
works. If we realized this, and let people do as they choose, the country would
be much better off. - Fred Reed
[Editor's note: The greatest percentage of racists in this country are now in the minority groups and are further isolating themselves and tribalizing themselves against the 'whites' and the 'Constitution of the United States.' The Democrats-liberals-communists are using this fact to further destroy our republic. That is why the Democrats love our wide open border policy. Civil unrest and/or home-grown terrorist attacks bring us much closer to Martial Law and the end of freedom.
Every liberal you know is either a glaring example of a total idiot, mentally ill - or a traitor to this country. It's one, two or all three of those.]
No comments:
Post a Comment