|
Rjmech returned with a vengeance and broke up a friendly round. |
Rjmech won this week against ten players, after taking many weeks off. He is heading to Las Vegas and the Luxor. The poker players in Vegas have less money available to them with RJ in town.
T3chlady is in Las Vegas this week! So that town's poker players are under assault again from the NPP stable.
LittleRedElf just came back from his World Series of Poker tournaments and Faldo knows he hurt the cash games while there.
Poor Las Vegas. Poor little Las Vegas. Going broke as the NPP veterans have their way with the mopes at those tables. After playing in our weekly games, anywhere in Las Vegas is a 'soft seat' in comparison.
2nd - T3chlady
3rd - GMOgolf
Bubble - Absea98
Oh, and last week, Faldo won against twelve players and got lucky TWICE to defeat the Elf heads up:
2nd - LittleRedElf
3rd - T3chlady
4th - Theedouble*d
Bubble - Tigercub8189
Congratulations to Rjmech on his 29th NPP tournament win.
Now on to the silliness of a liberal trying to debate Faldo:
With Faldo's car dropped at the body shop for some repairs, he was at the mercy of his wife's driving. We ended up in our little home town downtown district. We walked around and stopped into a bakery/sandwich shop for some bread sampling and to buy some cookies.
While the wife shopped, Faldo sat at a table and looked at the free magazines (ad magazines really). There was one article that caught Faldo's eye. It was written by a lawyer Nick Roumel and it was the feature article in the liberal rag of an ad magazine. I won't go into the details on how I knew it was a liberal publication, so you will have to trust Faldo on this one.
The irony and hypocrisy of liberals using capitalism (and the business of selling advertising to businesses) while spreading socialism and communism, seems to escape liberals for some reason. But I digress.
The title of Nick Roumel's article was "The Gun Summit Nobody Wants". This is why the article caught Faldo's eye.
Basically Nick was lamenting that he has tried several times to have 'a real summit' with 'all the correct people' from 'all sides of the debate' and 'appropriate agencies' to come up with real solutions in order to end 'senseless violence'.
His assertion was that the right wing was too hung up on the 2nd Amendment to bother discussing any type of compromise. And the left has offered to hold the summit a few times, only to 'withdraw' their offer near the date citing safety and security concerns.
Mr. Roumel is convinced that such a summit would net real solutions that will end senseless gun violence. And he wants to know why neither side is interested in holding one?
What about all the other senseless violence Nick? Only gun violence concerns you?
Well, Faldo contacted Nick Roumel, in care of the ad mag's editor, and here it is:
Hello Nick,
No one from the left-socialist-communist
side wants a gun summit, because they will lose the debate.
Besides, they have their minds made up.
It’s time to confiscate all guns as far the Left is concerned.
No one from the
right-conservative-constitutional side will join your debate because you are
not looking for answers for gun violence.
Your “gun violence prevention task force”
idea is nothing more than a veiled “gun ban/confiscation task force”, and everyone
knows it.
To quote you, “Our nation seems more
divided than ever regarding firearm ownership and gun violence.”
Really? Your prejudice toward the 2nd
amendment is showing sir. That’s why your “summit” got no traction.
Firearm ownership is a constitutional
right. Gun violence is a crime. Two separate things.
Chicago is a “gun free” zone. How is that
working out? But again facts are not something liberals are interested in.
Gun ownership prevents more crimes than
it causes.
Gun violence – when guns are banned –
just creates knife, bomb, car, machete, club, poison violence in it’s place -
with the same gun violence by criminals who did not follow the confiscation
laws. This is a fact. Only difference is – there are MORE victims because the
good folks cannot protect themselves.
Liberals want guns banned to protect
themselves from citizens when THEY riot and create havoc. Nothing more.
Just like in Germany before the Nazis
took over.
The Democrats want the citizens unarmed
for when they seize control. Nothing more.
Safe citizens is the last thing a leftist
or liberal really care about. It’s their own skin they are protecting.
And what true bleeding hear liberals
don’t want to admit or their brains refuse to accept is that if they reviewed
history, unarmed citizens eventually become slaves by their governments.
The left-socialist-communist Democrat
leaders do know it and they happily use their “useful idiot” bleeding hearts to
get the citizenry unarmed.
The 2nd amendment is there to
protect Americans from the government – not from necessarily criminals and
liberals. Although the 2nd Amendment does protect us from criminals,
as well as other traitors and enemies of the United States.
Japan and Germany did not try an invasion
in WWII because as a Japanese general put it, “there would be an American with
a rifle behind every blade of grass.” Both of those countries had slave
citizens with no such option.
Did you ever look at pictures of Jews
lined up in trenches while the German soldiers stood above them?
Did you ever look at pictures of the work
camps in North Korea or the diamond mines in Africa?
Did you ever look at the pictures of the
slaves in the Southern plantations in the USA before the Civil War?
How many guns was it that the Jews, North
Koreans, Africans or African-Americans have in their hands at that time
exactly?
Take a look and count them, would you
please?
I’ll be glad to have a “summit, debate,
discussion” or anything else you want to have.
Liberalism is a religion. Facts don’t
matter to liberals.
I think it is truly a mental illness,
just as many on the left view people who believe in God.
Some liberals heal or recover when enough
truth and fact seeps in. Most never do.
The left-socialist-communist Democrat
leaders rely on this, along with the brainwashing of the young (day care thru
college – all part of the plan as Nikita Khrushchev told us in the 1960’s and
the Democrats listened!).
Nick, you are either a useful idiot or a
traitor to the United States Constitution.
You tell me which it is.
Sincerely, Faldo
Faldo actually got a response from Mr. Roumel. And I will share that next week!